Ruby on Rails is a Dead Language
- May 18, 2009 11:14 AM
- General, Web Trends, Ruby on Rails
- Comments (10)
Matt Gifford, (aka ColdFuMonkeh) twittered an article that has lead me to a startling conclusion: Ruby on Rails is a dead language! Read more to find out why.
Read More
Print
Send
Digg It!

Comments
Perhaps it's the opposite. We're too good at our jobs for there to be vacancies? :)
The release of CF 9 (Centaur) and it's amazing new features and tie-ins with Flex (amongst other things) will only go to further increase the marketability of ColdFusion as a coding language. Couple that with open-source CFML alternatives, an ever-expanding community AND a firmly written development plan currently up to CF11, this indicates completely the opposite.
I agree that the research for the article was poor, and yes, if Rails had less job listings...
We all know the truth though.
ColdFusion is not a language. ColdFusion is an application server. CFML is a language.
People are realising that this is a toy framework that views the world in a very simplistic way. That means to write a decent application you're continually fighting against Rails and what it wants to do.
The hype dust has settled and at last it's possible to see Rails for what it is. Still not supporting internationalization properly. Offering flawed pluralizations. Twitter replaced large chunks of their back-end queueing system with Scala because Rails just doesn't cut the mustard.
Java Enterprise Edition by contrast is a well designed, mature, scalable framework and makes Rails look like Fisher Price material.
Active record pattern, it is a fast solution for simple, CRUD like, business logic, but failed when facing more complex business logic.
that is why RoR is faded away.
Lesson learned...never judge a web framework from its 'youtube videos' :)